I am one of those biologists who has a soft spot for what is budding in biology.
It is nearly as if biology would be the one particular topic on the planet that is constantly shifting.
However, over the years, some words have develop into “blessed” and have grow to be part of the common language of science and scientists generally. One particular such term is called “flaccid definition.”
This term was offered to me by a bioethicist pal, Dr. Leslie Carpenter. She was pointing out that although there are several words that are nearly meaningless without having their proper definition, this distinct word does not match into any on the categories. In addition, it does not have a dictionary definition, so it truly is vital that we comprehend what it means before we get too excited regarding the word.
Flaccid definition is usually applied for the biological sciences within a number of ways. It could mean to use the word at an extremely leisurely pace and not take it to the next level. It might imply to use the word in an abstract or poetic solution to describe an event.
And, not surprisingly, it may imply that the biological sciences must prevent a flaccid definition. Having parts of a research proposal said that, in terms of evolutionary biology, as an example, the word seems to fit.
With each of the issues that we find out along with the sorts of stories that we tell, it could be tempting to embellish a story, like the story of the three trilobites or the “clam-eating” aliens, and to include them within the story with the rise of mankind. However, the rise of humanity seems to become as considerably an event in the life of a single person since it is within the life of a whole species.
The creation of humanity is a correct story that fits within the parameters of your biological sciences. Devoid of an evolutionary story, it is actually tough to explain the life history of an individual or of a species.
One from the complications with using the word in an abstract way is that it truly is simple to misuse it. We are able to use it in an evolutionary parts of a research proposal way to describe what occurred, but we have to nonetheless demonstrate that we’re displaying a clear example from the finish result.
Another challenge with using the word in an abstract way is that it suggests that we are engaging inside the scientific version of “theory.” When we use flaccid definition, we’re too close to an evolutionary story.
Of course, we do not really need to assume that we know all of the specifics in order to do what we would like to do. We are able to nonetheless develop scientific stories that involve the kind of scientific data that is certainly located within a fantastic textbook, but that is far less abstract than what exactly is bubbling up from a popular biology book.
I assume that flaccid definition fits into the biological sciences. It does not fit nicely in to the social sciences or into well known culture, however it does appear to fit properly in to the physiology of a person and into an evolutionary story.